A group disagrees with an Australian law and suggests using violence to force a change. Based on the fact, how would this approach be viewed?

A group disagrees with an Australian law and suggests using violence to force a change. Based on the fact, how would this approach be viewed?

• AIt would be rejected because Australians reject violence as a way to change the law.Correct
• BIt would be accepted if many people disagree with the law.
• CIt would be required before any law can change.
• DIt would be accepted as the main way Australians change laws.

The fact says Australians reject violence as a way to change the law, so using violence to force a change would be rejected.